
Photo courtesy of Fender
August 22nd, 2008 – I’ve always thought of myself as someone who is not blinded by brand names or fanboy-ism. I am willing to try out anything regardless of the prestige of a company’s brand; you’ll never know what you’re missing if you don’t try it all. I know plenty of people who won’t touch certain brands because of their perceived “low-class” status. For guitars, brands like Epiphone and Squier don’t exactly get a tonne of support in elite circles.
Lately, I’ve heard that Squier is making a great sounding bass for under $300. Epiphone has always had a reputation for good hollow body electric guitars. It’s a shame that consumers who can afford a better brand, usually discount the less expensive brands completely. In some cases, the less expensive brands may be better than the “real thing”.
In the 1980′s Fender wanted to begin manufacturing guitars in Japan. They manufactured a guitar that used old Fender designs and some of the original old stock of parts. This meant that the Japanese guitars had vintage parts and, coupled with much improved quality control, better workmanship than American and Mexican made Fenders. Even the Squiers of Japan had these features, and fearing that these high quality, low cost guitars would cannibalize sales in the US for US made guitars, Japanese guitars were not sold outside of Japan (except for a couple years before Fender USA realized this was bad for their US facilities). This policy continues to today and Japanese Squiers, from the brief period when they were available in North America, are highly sought.
Are brand names a factor in your search for new instruments or music gear? Are you loyal to a specific brand?

4 Comments, Comment or Ping
Alf
I’m teetering on the edge of brandname-whorism since at first I couldn’t afford the fenders & gibsons and didn’t want to settle for the lesser brands when other companies produce similar shapes for more value. However, I’m buying into the mantra of “there’s no such thing as the real deal” despite checkered QC from Gibson. Plus resale value will always be high and even profitable. But now I’m deciding whether to get lesser known handmade Japanese copies but a bit cheaper rather than going with the big 2. It’s a coin toss at the moment
Aug 23rd, 2008
3NOS
the thing w/ brand names is reputation. i’d like to try out guitars from local luthiers or smaller companies, but it can be a big investment with uncertain outcomes. i also admit i’ve ignored squires and epiphones based solely on name even tho i know some can be quite decent. my wallet will probably end up deciding what my next purchase will be.
Sep 6th, 2008
Reply to “Are brand names important to you?”